Baby boomers had it much easier than the younger generations purchasing a home - regardless of needing to pay exorbitantly high rates of interest.

The generation born after the war were struck with huge 18 percent rate of interest back in the late 1980s.

Those repayments were crippling, when they were maturing in the seventies and eighties, however homes were significantly cheaper compared with typical incomes.

That was also back when Australia's population was practically half of what it is today, long before yearly immigration levels skyrocketed.

Baby boomer financial expert Saul Eslake purchased his first home in Melbourne's St Kilda East for $105,000 in 1984 on a $35,000 salary when he was 26, after benefiting from free university education.

With an $80,000 mortgage, he was obtaining bit more than double his pay before tax and hits out at any suggestion his boomer generation did it harder - in spite of the high rate of interest he paid.

'I paid eighteen-and-a-half per cent for some of that but my very first house cost $105,000 and it took me less than 3 years to conserve up the deposit,' he informed Daily Mail Australia.

'Although rates of interest are less than half what I was paying, it was nowhere near as hard as now and I didn't have HECS debt to settle due to the fact that I was part of that fortunate generation when it was free.

The generation born after the war were struck with enormous 18 percent interest rates back in the late 1980s (envisioned is Terrigal on the NSW Central Coast)

'My generation had it pretty simple - we secured free education, we got housing really cheaply and we have actually made a motza out of the boost in home costs that we have chosen.'

In 1980, Sydney's mid-point priced home cost $65,000, or just 4.5 times the average, full-time male wage in an era when a female would have a hard time to get a mortgage without a signature from her hubby.

Property information group PropTrack approximated Sydney's median home would cost $338,000 today, or simply 4.3 times the typical income now for all Australian workers, if house rates had actually increased at the exact same rate as wages throughout the past 45 years.

In 2025, Sydney's middle-priced house costs $1.47 million or 14.3 times the average, full-time income of $103,000.

But that price-to-income ratio surges to 18.7 if it's based upon the average salary of $78,567 for all workers.

AMP deputy chief financial expert Diana Mousina, a Millennial, said the younger generations were having a tougher time now conserving up for 20 per cent mortgage deposit simply to purchase a home.

'The problem now is just getting into the marketplace - that's what takes the larger portion of trying to save; it takes 11 years to conserve,' she stated.

Real estate information group PropTrack estimated Sydney's typical home would cost $338,000 today, or simply 4.3 times the typical salary now for all Australian employees, if home rates had increased at the very same rate as incomes throughout the past 45 years

Boomers coped sky high interest rates in the 80s - they haven't been that high because - but they had it simpler since house prices were much more economical

BREAKING NEWS

The problem Anthony Albanese DOESN'T wish to discuss on the economy as immigration soars

Melbourne's mid-point house price cost simply $40,000 in 1980 or 2.8 times the average male wage.

If cost had actually stayed constant, a common Melbourne would now cost just $205,400.

But the Victorian capital's median house rate of $850,000 is now 10.8 times the average income for all workers.

Brisbane's typical home price expense $32,750 in 1980 or simply 2.2 times what a typical guy earned.

That would be $174,600 today if buying power hadn't changed.

Queensland capital houses now cost $910,000 or 11.6 times the average wage.

The major banks are not likely to provide someone more than 5 times their pay before tax, which means many couples would now struggle to get a loan for a capital city house unless they moved to a far, outer suburban area and had a huge deposit.

Housing affordability degraded following the introduction of the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount rate in 1999, just before yearly immigration levels tripled during the 2000s.

'Since about 2000, you've seen home costs relative to incomes increase at a significant amount - it's been the reality that we have actually been running high levels of population development - so migration, so more demand for housing,' Ms Mousina stated.

Baby boomer economic expert Saul Eslake bought his first home in Melbourne's East Kilda for $105,000 in 1984 on a $35,000 wage when he was 26, after taking advantage of free university education

'We have been running high migration targets, at the same time we haven't been building enough homes across the country.

'We do have quite beneficial financial investment concessions for housing, including negative tailoring, capital gains tax concession.'

Mr Eslake stated political leaders from both sides of politics wanted house prices to increase, because more citizens were resident than occupants attempting to get into the market.

'For all the crocodile tears the politicians shed about the problems dealing with prospective very first home purchasers, they know that in any given year, there's just 110,000 of them,' he stated.

'Even if you presume that for everybody who is successful, in becoming a very first home buyer, there are five or six who would like to but can't - that's at many around 750,000 elect policies that would restrain the rate at which home costs go up.

'Whereas the politicians understand that at any point in time, there are at least 11million Australians who own their own home; there are 2.5 million Australians who own at least one financial investment residential or commercial property.

'Even the dumbest of our politicians - as the Americans say, "Do that mathematics" which is why at every election, political leaders on both sides of the divide - while bewailing the troubles faced by first-home buyers - promise and execute policies that make it worse since they understand that a huge bulk of the Australian population do not desire the issue to be fixed.'

Sydney was the very first market to become seriously unaffordable as Australia's most expensive city housing market.

PropTrack approximated Sydney's average house would cost $338,000 today, or just 4.3 times the typical wage now for all Australian workers, if home prices had actually increased at the very same pace as incomes throughout the previous 45 years (pictured is an auction at Homebush in the city's west)

Australians alerted to get ready for a substantial 'expense explosion'

In 1990, the common Sydney home cost $187,500 or $447,300 now if affordability had actually stayed consistent.

A decade later on 2000, quickly after the intro of the 50 percent capital gains tax discount rate, a common Sydney house cost $284,950.

That would equate into $544,000 today if price had actually remained consistent.

This would also be the point where a single, average-income earner might still get a loan at a stretch with a 20 percent mortgage deposit.

By 2010, Sydney's average house cost $600,000 or nine times the average, full-time wage, putting a home with a backyard beyond the reach of an average-income earner purchasing on their own.

In addition, the housing cost crisis has actually worsened as Australia's population has climbed up from 14.5 million in 1980 to 27.3 million now.

During the 2000s, yearly net abroad migration doubled from 111,441 at the start of the years to 315,700 by 2008 when the mining boom was driving population development.

After Australia was closed during Covid, migration skyrocketed to a new record high of 548,800 in 2023, causing house prices climbing even as the Reserve Bank was installing interest rates.

When it pertained to the stereotype of youths wasting their money on smashed avocado breakfasts rather of conserving for a home deposit, Mr Eslake had a simple answer to that.

'At the really least, a highly noticeable rolling of the eyeballs,' he stated.

SydneyBrisbaneMelbourne